Tag: review

Beer and Immunity

Old School Old hands used to be cynical about debriefs – a “search for the guilty, punishment of the innocent, and praise and honours for the non-participants.” New School Candid Cycle uses human experience and structured questions to understand what happened, what it means and what should change. AI strengthens a human-led inquiry rather than… Read More

Learning from history

Margaret MacMillan opens The Uses and Abuses of History (2009) with this warning, and it’s worth sitting with. History doesn’t offer clean lessons; it offers material, and material can be shaped to fit almost any conclusion someone has already reached. MacMillan is careful to distinguish between using history and abusing it. Using it means treating… Read More

When the Horn Is in the Picture: A Fable About Capability and Blind Spots

If your organisation’s picture of itself has been painted from one vantage point for too long, the Universal Framework offers a structured way to look again – across the same seven domains the animals uncovered together: Strategy \& Direction, Decision-Making Quality, Risk \& Resilience, Execution \& Control, People Leadership, Learning \& Improvement, and Governance \& Accountability. Every engagement, regardless of scope, is assessed against the same E1 (Exists) / E2 (Enabled) / E3 (Executed) evidence logic – so the result reflects what can be demonstrated, not just what is believed. Read More

How capable are you?

Three evidence tests (E1–E3)

For each domain we look for three levels of evidence:

E1 – Exists
Do the core structures and processes exist?
(Policies, frameworks, processes, roles, plans, registers, documented approaches.)
E2 – Enabled
Are they supported and usable?
(Clear owners, resources, training, tools, data, and regular review cycles.)
E3 – Executed
Are they actually used and making a difference?
(Real examples where they shape decisions, behaviours, investments, and outcomes.)
In practical terms, E1/E2 tell you “have we built the system?” and E3 asks “does the system change what happens?”

Maturity scale (N–P–L–F)

Evidence across E1–E3 is then converted into a four‑step maturity rating for each domain:

N – Absent
No meaningful evidence; capability does not meet current needs.
P – Ad hoc
Informal, person‑dependent, inconsistent; pockets of good practice but not reliable.
L – Defined
Documented and repeatable, but weakly enforced; often strong on design, weaker on routine use.
F – Operational
Embedded, consistent, tested, and reviewed; good evidence that it works in practice.y Read More

The Cartographer’s Lantern

In a valley often swallowed by fog, the village of Bellmere chose a new warden each year to keep its people safe from flood, fire, and storm. One autumn, a clever merchant arrived with a polished brass lantern. “This lantern,” he announced, “measures the village’s readiness. Hold it near your granaries, bridges, wells, and watchtowers.… Read More

The road ahead for the Sydney Swans

A comparison which treats Ms Ley’s quoted line “accountability must be extended to anyone who was aware of what was happening and had the power to act” as given and compares it against the well-documented legal/coronial “ought to have known” standard. Read More

Alignment of the Universal Framework with the American Productivity & Quality Center’s Process Classification Framework®

Understand whether your organisation is capable, not just compliant Read More

Unveiling a range of Gigs to meet your needs

We are pleased to launch a range of solutions which aim to meet various resilience needs by asking the right questions Read More

The move from traditional Business Continuity Planning to Operational Resilience is real and growing

How strong is the move from traditional Business Continuity and RTOs to a focus on Operational Resilience and Impact Tolerance? Read More

Business Continuity Review Document Checklist for Clients

Selecting the right paperwork to achieve an appropriate capability assessment review. Read More