“Good” Decision

How might you make a “good” decision?

NO
YES

Elements of General Approach

Focus on the things you care about.
Engage those with a stake in the approach
Illustrative example of potential decision criteria
Invite input and reflection
Cluster like with like to avoid duplication
Encourage filtering to validate
Compare criteria to establish the most important – for weighting
Back of envelope tool (Michigan State University)

A decision matrix is just one of many tools currently considered “best practice” for good decision-making. It uses a systematic approach to narrow down options, comparing choices by using a combination of weighted voting and ranking.

A criteria matrix is especially helpful when:

  • Options for a solution are many (10-20 choices)
  • There are a significant number of criteria (6-15 items)
  • Quick consensus is needed to proceed
Illustrative example of weighted criteria
(app screen)

1. Quality Decision Making Apps

From our FREE OughtWe Lite – to our VALUE OughtWe Pro

2. Quality Decision Making Support

Three key steps – with validation

3. Your Tailored Decision Making App

1. <Your> Name (Text) in Decision Maker Logo – Client name (or acronym) nested in the Decision Maker app Logo.

2. Reference (Text) – a description of your context – to be inserted under the edited “Reference” Header of the Criteria & Weight Screen.

3. Your Criteria

You can populate Your Decision Maker with up to nine of your specified criteria.

Specifics of each criterion.

For each of the (up to nine) specified criteria, please provide:

(i) Criteria Name (Text) – example “Alignment with Values”.

(ii) Criteria Description (Text) – example “To what extent is this option aligned with our supported values?”.

(iii) Rationale for Criteria (Text) – example “Reference: Corporate Ethics Policy (2021)”.

(iv) Criteria Weightings – your agreed default settings (positive or negative – from minus nine to plus nine).

Note: When being used “in the field” individual users will still be able to add criteria to reflect and support the context of any specific decision being addressed by them.

Customized DecisionMaking App

NB Development of the above specifications is best done with others. Especially those who need to develop and sign off on “what they value – and how much they care about those things they value”.


Unknown's avatar

Author: John Salter & Associates Consulting Services

John Salter - specialising in the facilitation of risk-based capability reviews; needs-based training; business continuity planning; crisis management exercises; and organisational debriefing. Recognised for “preventing disasters, or where that is not possible, reducing the potential for harm” Ref: Barrister H Selby, Inquest Handbook, 1998. Distracted by golf, camping, fishing, reading, red wine, movies and theatre.

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.